|
Does TV Have A Liberal Bias?
He points out, for example that a 1996 study showed that most journalists were Democrats. Eighty-nine percent of them voted for Clinton compared to 43 percent of the general population. From the standpoint of many conservatives, TV news tends to be liberal because it features stories on gay rights, civil rights abuses, antiwar demonstrations, women's rights, environmental issues, etc. -- all seen as being liberal causes. But, from the standpoint of some liberals television is conservative because it's seen as being pro-business, without giving adequate time to alternative, non-mainstream views. These arguments primarily surface in how news is covered.
People in the hard sciences also tend to be more conservative than people in the social sciences. The latter group includes many news people and actors, and some writers and artists people whose ideas often surface in the media. Their views also tend to "push the envelope" of social change.
Given the fact that the heads of the media conglomerates tend to be conservative, how do the two factions coexist; after all isn't it management that ultimately "calls the shots?"
We've already noted that most media consumers like ideas that a slightly ahead of the status quo, as shown by the green area in the normal curve represented below. (This diagram is discussed in some detail elsewhere.)
Even the most conservative media owners, CEOs, directors, etc. regularly use sex and semi-nudity, which are not exactly associated with mainstream conservatism, to enhance profits. One of the best known media moguls--a person widely
considered to be quite conservative--regularly features photos of
attractive, bare-breasted women in one of his most popular (non-U.S.)
daily newspapers. The feature is clearly linked to increased readership
and profits.
To cite two other examples, in March of 2002, the FCC received hundreds of complaints from viewers over the popular, titillating (and lucrative) Victoria's Secret lingerie programming featured on the Disney owned ABC television network. In late 2004, the FOX network, considered the most conservative in news, faced the largest fines ever levied by the Federal Communications Commission up to that point for sexually indecent programming. Clearly, there is a frequently a conflict between profits
and what many people see as traditional values -- with profits typically
winning the contest. Other opinions on this topic can be found in
this Business, Sex, and Morality
Forum posting. News Bias
Thus, there has been a recent emphasis on moving to a more selective, conservative tone in newscasts.
Both programs featured Republican guests (generally considered conservative) more often than Democratic guests (generally considered to be more liberal). But, as shown here, the FOX news channel favored Republicans by a margin of about 8:1. The same survey showed that FOX news featured white guests 93 percent of the time and male guests 91 percent of the time. Comparing FOX news with the other primary news sources in the United States, Canada and Britain over a series of days in early 2003 indicated that not only did FOX news maintain a pro-Republican Administration spin compared to other news sources, but that many news items critical of the administration were either not presented, or in some cases were presented and subtly dismissed, or even discredited.** Although this approach, together with FOX's impressive
graphics and effects, is clearly popular with their many viewers,
it raises serious questions about balanced news coverage and a well
informed electorate. The issue of incestuous amplification is important in this discussion.
Possibly not unrelated, to entice viewers and raise ratings TV programming regularly "pushes the envelope" with new and often risqué ideas. Sexual themes are predominately featured along with ever-more-explicit forms of violence. Although viewers complain, they also regularly tune in -- and keep the ratings high.
* In February,
2003, Eric Alterman's book, A What Liberal Media? The Truth About
Bias and the News, was published. This exceptionally well documented
book credits the shift to the right in the recent decade to efforts
by well funded conservative think tanks and their financial backers.
Other books on these topics include -
To Home Page
** According to data, during the Iraq war Americans turned to foreign news sources in great numbers, especially at the beginning of the war, to get a more balanced and realistic perspective. *** In the well-reviewed and thought-provoking book, The Sound Bite Society: Television and the American Mind, Jeffrey Scheuer argues that television relentlessly simplifies, and simplicity is the core principle of conservatism. TV likewise punishes complex ideas and messages, which are the core of liberalism. Scheuer notes, for example, that the causes of poverty, unemployment, the crime rate, gangs, etc. are complex and cannot be effectively addressed with quick sound bites and political slogans -- even though the latter come across best on TV and appeal to voters. Thus, rather than being a "liberal medium," according to Scheuer, television strongly promotes an appealing, conservative, oversimplified, direct-solution approach to the complex social and political issues of our times. For example, rather than address the real causes of crime, the solution that's easiest to understand is: get tougher on crime and build more prisons. Although this simplistic good-evil view is attractive to voters, it doesn't confront the causes of the problem.
© 2007, All Rights Reserved
|